Home/Case Law/CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES

Filed: Aug 25, 2025
Riverside
ADJ16229232

CompFox AI Summary

Lien claimant sought reconsideration of the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) Findings & Orders issued on May 13, 2025, which found no proper request for a medical-legal examination when services were provided. The lien claimant contended that a contested claim existed at the time, justifying their medical-legal services under Labor Code section 4060. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the petition for reconsideration but deferred a final decision after reconsideration, pending further review of the merits and the entire record. The WCAB also highlighted that the parties were not provided with accurate notice of the case's transmission to the Appeals Board as required by Labor Code section 5909.

CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Lien claimant sought reconsideration of the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) Findings & Orders issued on May 13, 2025, which found no proper request for a medical-legal examination when services were provided. The lien claimant contended that a contested claim existed at the time, justifying their medical-legal services under Labor Code section 4060. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the petition for reconsideration but deferred a final decision after reconsideration, pending further review of the merits and the entire record. The WCAB also highlighted that the parties were not provided with accurate notice of the case's transmission to the Appeals Board as required by Labor Code section 5909.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES workers compensation case in Riverside. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES case law summary from Riverside. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES Case Analysis

CRYSTAL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE EMPLOYEES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Riverside. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.