Home/Case Law/CURTIS MADDEN III vs. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, VIVIAN EBERLE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CURTIS MADDEN III vs. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, VIVIAN EBERLE

Filed: May 09, 2025
Santa Ana
ADJ18315308

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the decision that California has subject matter jurisdiction over Curtis Madden III's industrial injury claim against the Seattle Seahawks. The jurisdiction was established because Madden accepted a verbal offer of employment in California, creating a valid contract for hire under state law. The WCAB ruled that the claim is not preempted by federal labor law as its resolution does not require interpreting the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Minor amendments were made to the factual findings to clarify that injury was 'claimed' rather than 'sustained' and to conform the listed body parts.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) affirmed the decision that California has subject matter jurisdiction over Curtis Madden III's industrial injury claim against the Seattle Seahawks. The jurisdiction was established because Madden accepted a verbal offer of employment in California, creating a valid contract for hire under state law. The WCAB ruled that the claim is not preempted by federal labor law as its resolution does not require interpreting the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Minor amendments were made to the factual findings to clarify that injury was 'claimed' rather than 'sustained' and to conform the listed body parts.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.