CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Seymore's petition for reconsideration because it was filed against an interim order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied Seymore's petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. Seymore failed to demonstrate that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy later in the proceedings. Therefore, both the reconsideration and removal petitions were denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Seymore's petition for reconsideration because it was filed against an interim order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied Seymore's petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. Seymore failed to demonstrate that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy later in the proceedings. Therefore, both the reconsideration and removal petitions were denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.