CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought removal after her attorney was dismissed, arguing prejudice to her ability to enforce ongoing medical treatment awards. The Appeals Board denied removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, as the attorney's withdrawal was not at a critical stage. The Board affirmed the WCJ's dismissal, noting the attorney provided ample notice and offered assistance with award enforcement. The applicant was advised to contact the Information and Assistance Officer for further aid.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought removal after her attorney was dismissed, arguing prejudice to her ability to enforce ongoing medical treatment awards. The Appeals Board denied removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, as the attorney's withdrawal was not at a critical stage. The Board affirmed the WCJ's dismissal, noting the attorney provided ample notice and offered assistance with award enforcement. The applicant was advised to contact the Information and Assistance Officer for further aid.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.