CompFox AI Summary
Defendant sought removal of the WCJ's order closing discovery and setting the case for trial, alleging irreparable harm and ongoing discovery needs. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding defendant failed to demonstrate due diligence in pursuing discovery earlier. Defendant's delays in requesting reevaluations, record releases, and QME panels were not excused. The Board determined defendant's arguments regarding prejudice could be addressed at trial, and reconsideration would be available post-decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant sought removal of the WCJ's order closing discovery and setting the case for trial, alleging irreparable harm and ongoing discovery needs. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding defendant failed to demonstrate due diligence in pursuing discovery earlier. Defendant's delays in requesting reevaluations, record releases, and QME panels were not excused. The Board determined defendant's arguments regarding prejudice could be addressed at trial, and reconsideration would be available post-decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.