Home/Case Law/DARVALE JACKSON vs. SENECA RESIDENTIAL AND DAY TREATMENT CENTER, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular Decision

DARVALE JACKSON vs. SENECA RESIDENTIAL AND DAY TREATMENT CENTER, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Apr 08, 2013
Oakland
ADJ8236013, ADJ8236236

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a petition for reconsideration and removal filed by the applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was not taken from a "final" order, but rather from an interlocutory procedural decision. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant. The WCAB specifically declined to adopt the judge's statement regarding a lack of substantial evidence, noting that no evidence had yet been admitted.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a petition for reconsideration and removal filed by the applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was not taken from a "final" order, but rather from an interlocutory procedural decision. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant. The WCAB specifically declined to adopt the judge's statement regarding a lack of substantial evidence, noting that no evidence had yet been admitted.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.