Home/Case Law/DAVID GUZMAN vs. SYSCO FOODS, ZURICH AMERICAN AND AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAVID GUZMAN vs. SYSCO FOODS, ZURICH AMERICAN AND AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE

Filed: Mar 26, 2013
Oxnard
ADJ7106688, ADJ7106693, ADJ7503858

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a workers' compensation applicant seeking reconsideration of a decision denying his claim for a psychiatric injury. While the Board would have admitted the applicant's medical reports, they found these reports lacked substantial evidence. Specifically, the reports were deemed unreliable as it was unclear if the conclusions were based on Dr. Curtis's own examination or a collaborative effort, failing to meet the burden of proof for industrial causation. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a workers' compensation applicant seeking reconsideration of a decision denying his claim for a psychiatric injury. While the Board would have admitted the applicant's medical reports, they found these reports lacked substantial evidence. Specifically, the reports were deemed unreliable as it was unclear if the conclusions were based on Dr. Curtis's own examination or a collaborative effort, failing to meet the burden of proof for industrial causation. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID GUZMAN vs. SYSCO FOODS, ZURICH AMERICAN AND AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE (2013) – Oxnard | CompFox