CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed applicant David Pack's petition for reconsideration and removal because it lacked a proper proof of service, a defect that the applicant was given an opportunity to cure but failed to do. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended denial on the merits as well if not dismissed as defective. The Board also strongly admonished applicant's attorney for making unsubstantiated accusations of fraud against the WCJ, noting that this conduct may warrant sanctions.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed applicant David Pack's petition for reconsideration and removal because it lacked a proper proof of service, a defect that the applicant was given an opportunity to cure but failed to do. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which recommended denial on the merits as well if not dismissed as defective. The Board also strongly admonished applicant's attorney for making unsubstantiated accusations of fraud against the WCJ, noting that this conduct may warrant sanctions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.