Home/Case Law/DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE

Filed: Sep 23, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ2998349

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denies the applicant’s petition for reconsideration, finding no new evidence presented and reiterating the reasons given in the July 8, 2008 decision.

DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denies the applicant’s petition for reconsideration, finding no new evidence presented and reiterating the reasons given in the July 8, 2008 decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE Case Analysis

DEANNA PRIEST (DEANNA PRIEST-HENSLEY) vs. MICHAEL HOUSPIAN, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.