Home/Case Law/DEBORAH GROSS vs. THE BOEING COMPANY, SEDGWICK
Regular DecisionPetition for Reconsideration

DEBORAH GROSS vs. THE BOEING COMPANY, SEDGWICK

Filed: Sep 16, 2022
Marina Del Rey
ADJ12896538

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a concise summary for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Deborah Gross's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the finding that her claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The WCJ found Gross failed to provide evidence or arguments demonstrating why the statute of limitations should not apply to her cumulative trauma claim filed over eight years after the alleged injury. Gross's submitted exhibits and cited case law were found to be either irrelevant, factually distinguishable, or unsupported by the record. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report and incorporated it into their decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a concise summary for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied Deborah Gross's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the finding that her claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The WCJ found Gross failed to provide evidence or arguments demonstrating why the statute of limitations should not apply to her cumulative trauma claim filed over eight years after the alleged injury. Gross's submitted exhibits and cited case law were found to be either irrelevant, factually distinguishable, or unsupported by the record. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report and incorporated it into their decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.