CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a worker injured in 2007 while employed by Max Mart, Inc., which was operating without workers' compensation insurance. The administrative law judge found the employer and its substantial shareholder, Sean Loloee, liable for the injury. Loloee later sought reconsideration, arguing the decision was unjust due to his lack of counsel and inability to pay, and that the lack of insurance was unintentional. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed his petition as untimely, as it was filed over a year after the award. Additionally, the Board noted the petition was also "skeletal" for failing to provide specific legal and factual grounds.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a worker injured in 2007 while employed by Max Mart, Inc., which was operating without workers' compensation insurance. The administrative law judge found the employer and its substantial shareholder, Sean Loloee, liable for the injury. Loloee later sought reconsideration, arguing the decision was unjust due to his lack of counsel and inability to pay, and that the lack of insurance was unintentional. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed his petition as untimely, as it was filed over a year after the award. Additionally, the Board noted the petition was also "skeletal" for failing to provide specific legal and factual grounds.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.