CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a workers' compensation award. The applicant's petition focused on a discrepancy in the stipulated dates for permanent disability payments, which the original award failed to fully reflect. The defendant's petition argued for a lack of evidence regarding psychiatric disability apportionment and claimed the applicant was attempting a double recovery for prior injuries. The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition and granted the applicant's, amending the award to accurately reflect the parties' stipulations on the commencement of permanent disability benefits.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a workers' compensation award. The applicant's petition focused on a discrepancy in the stipulated dates for permanent disability payments, which the original award failed to fully reflect. The defendant's petition argued for a lack of evidence regarding psychiatric disability apportionment and claimed the applicant was attempting a double recovery for prior injuries. The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition and granted the applicant's, amending the award to accurately reflect the parties' stipulations on the commencement of permanent disability benefits.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.