CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a lien claimant, Associated Reproduction Services (ARS), seeking reconsideration of a decision that disallowed most of its lien for photocopying services. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's finding that ARS failed to meet its burden of proving the necessity and reasonableness of its charges. The Board affirmed that lien claimants must demonstrate that medical-legal expenses were reasonably, actually, and necessarily incurred to prove or disprove a contested claim, which ARS did not establish here.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a lien claimant, Associated Reproduction Services (ARS), seeking reconsideration of a decision that disallowed most of its lien for photocopying services. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's finding that ARS failed to meet its burden of proving the necessity and reasonableness of its charges. The Board affirmed that lien claimants must demonstrate that medical-legal expenses were reasonably, actually, and necessarily incurred to prove or disprove a contested claim, which ARS did not establish here.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.