CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the prior award for applicant Dionisio Vasquez's psychological injury, upholding the lien of Psychological Assessment Services for $22,772.71 plus penalties and interest. The Board also affirmed the lien of Royal Medical Group for treatment and reports dated December 8, 2007, and January 5, 2008, but excluded payment for a September 27, 2008 report. While the majority found substantial evidence supported the psychological treatment, a dissenting opinion argued that the number and intensity of therapy sessions, and the delay in treatment, lacked sufficient evidentiary support.
DIONISIO VASQUEZ vs. V CLAD LAMINATES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURES ASSOC. INSURANCE CO., VIRGINIA SURETY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the prior award for applicant Dionisio Vasquez's psychological injury, upholding the lien of Psychological Assessment Services for $22,772.71 plus penalties and interest. The Board also affirmed the lien of Royal Medical Group for treatment and reports dated December 8, 2007, and January 5, 2008, but excluded payment for a September 27, 2008 report. While the majority found substantial evidence supported the psychological treatment, a dissenting opinion argued that the number and intensity of therapy sessions, and the delay in treatment, lacked sufficient evidentiary support.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.