Home/Case Law/DONNA MARSHBANKS vs. UC DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRemoval

DONNA MARSHBANKS vs. UC DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Mar 15, 2018
Stockton
ADJ10361270

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal. The petition claimed the judge erred by allowing an additional PQME in internal medicine. However, the Board found no such order existed in the dismissed Case No. ADJ10361270, rendering the petition moot. Even if considered for a different case, removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the defendant failed to demonstrate. Reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy should an adverse decision arise.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal. The petition claimed the judge erred by allowing an additional PQME in internal medicine. However, the Board found no such order existed in the dismissed Case No. ADJ10361270, rendering the petition moot. Even if considered for a different case, removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which the defendant failed to demonstrate. Reconsideration was deemed an adequate remedy should an adverse decision arise.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.