CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision that awarded 74% permanent disability, excluding psychiatric impairment. The applicant argued for 100% permanent disability and that his injury was catastrophic, entitling him to an increased rating for his psychiatric condition. The Board affirmed the original decision, finding the injury was not catastrophic under Labor Code section 4660.1(c)(2)(B) and that the applicant failed to prove he was permanently totally disabled due to the industrial injury. The applicant's vocational expert's conclusions were deemed unreliable as they improperly considered non-industrial factors and psychiatric issues outside the scope of catastrophic injury.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision that awarded 74% permanent disability, excluding psychiatric impairment. The applicant argued for 100% permanent disability and that his injury was catastrophic, entitling him to an increased rating for his psychiatric condition. The Board affirmed the original decision, finding the injury was not catastrophic under Labor Code section 4660.1(c)(2)(B) and that the applicant failed to prove he was permanently totally disabled due to the industrial injury. The applicant's vocational expert's conclusions were deemed unreliable as they improperly considered non-industrial factors and psychiatric issues outside the scope of catastrophic injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.