Home/Case Law/EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

Filed: Sep 15, 2025
Santa Ana
ADJ13157138

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings of Fact, Award, and Order issued on June 12, 2025, which awarded applicant temporary and permanent disability. The defendant contested the retroactive disability awards, the calculation of the average weekly wage, and the admissibility of medical reports by Dr. Michael Einbund, given a later date of injury finding. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, adopting the WCJ's report, denied the petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings regarding the disability awards, the applicant's average weekly wage, and the admissibility of Dr. Einbund's reports, reasoning that the claim's injury period predated January 1, 2005, making the old procedural rules applicable.

EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings of Fact, Award, and Order issued on June 12, 2025, which awarded applicant temporary and permanent disability. The defendant contested the retroactive disability awards, the calculation of the average weekly wage, and the admissibility of medical reports by Dr. Michael Einbund, given a later date of injury finding. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, adopting the WCJ's report, denied the petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings regarding the disability awards, the applicant's average weekly wage, and the admissibility of Dr. Einbund's reports, reasoning that the claim's injury period predated January 1, 2005, making the old procedural rules applicable.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY workers compensation case in Santa Ana. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY case law summary from Santa Ana. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Case Analysis

EDDY PUTMAN vs. BALTIMORE ORIOLES, USF&G, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Ana. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.