Home/Case Law/EDUARDO ABAD vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

EDUARDO ABAD vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES

Filed: Jun 16, 2015
San Francisco
ADJ4448208 (SFO 0458693), ADJ2203337 (SFO 0459427), ADJ1383687 (SFO 0477579)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Eduardo Abad's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. California law grants 25 days to file such a petition after service, with limited extensions, and the petition here was filed beyond this jurisdictional deadline. Mailing proof is insufficient; the petition must be received by the Board within the timeframe. As the petition was late, the Board lacked authority to consider its merits.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Eduardo Abad's petition for reconsideration because it was untimely filed. California law grants 25 days to file such a petition after service, with limited extensions, and the petition here was filed beyond this jurisdictional deadline. Mailing proof is insufficient; the petition must be received by the Board within the timeframe. As the petition was late, the Board lacked authority to consider its merits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

EDUARDO ABAD vs. SAN FRANCISCO MARRIOTT, MARRIOTT CLAIMS SERVICES (2015) – San Francisco | CompFox