CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's orders appointing new orthopedic and psychiatric evaluators. The Board found the WCJ erred by directly appointing new physicians without first attempting to supplement existing medical reports or deposing prior evaluators, as per the McDuffie precedent. The Board determined the existing medical reports were not "fatally flawed" and directed the parties to pursue supplemental opinions or depositions before appointing new evaluators.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's orders appointing new orthopedic and psychiatric evaluators. The Board found the WCJ erred by directly appointing new physicians without first attempting to supplement existing medical reports or deposing prior evaluators, as per the McDuffie precedent. The Board determined the existing medical reports were not "fatally flawed" and directed the parties to pursue supplemental opinions or depositions before appointing new evaluators.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.