Home/Case Law/Edwin Mendoza vs. AUTO HAND-WASH
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Edwin Mendoza vs. AUTO HAND-WASH

Filed: May 25, 2012
Los Angeles
ADJ7948406

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for removal, ordering that the Labor Code section 132a claim be bifurcated from the main workers' compensation case. The Board found significant prejudice would result from hearing the recently filed 132a claim, which lacked completed discovery, alongside the case in chief. This decision corrects the WCJ's order that would have improperly consolidated these issues. The 132a claim, alleging discriminatory termination, will now be heard separately.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for removal, ordering that the Labor Code section 132a claim be bifurcated from the main workers' compensation case. The Board found significant prejudice would result from hearing the recently filed 132a claim, which lacked completed discovery, alongside the case in chief. This decision corrects the WCJ's order that would have improperly consolidated these issues. The 132a claim, alleging discriminatory termination, will now be heard separately.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Edwin Mendoza vs. AUTO HAND-WASH (2012) – Los Angeles | CompFox