CompFox AI Summary
Here's a summary of the case in four sentences for a lawyer:
The applicant sought reconsideration after the WCJ denied her claim for psychiatric injury AOE/COE, finding that actual employment events did not predominantly cause her condition. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, agreeing with the WCJ that the applicant failed to prove alleged unfair treatment by her supervisor or HR was not a subjective belief. The Board also affirmed the WCJ's finding that any actual employment events, such as performance critiques, constituted lawful, good faith personnel actions. Therefore, the applicant's petition was denied as she did not establish a compensable psychiatric injury.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Here's a summary of the case in four sentences for a lawyer:
The applicant sought reconsideration after the WCJ denied her claim for psychiatric injury AOE/COE, finding that actual employment events did not predominantly cause her condition. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, agreeing with the WCJ that the applicant failed to prove alleged unfair treatment by her supervisor or HR was not a subjective belief. The Board also affirmed the WCJ's finding that any actual employment events, such as performance critiques, constituted lawful, good faith personnel actions. Therefore, the applicant's petition was denied as she did not establish a compensable psychiatric injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.