Home/Case Law/ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionRemoval

ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: May 01, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ620371 (VNO 0542153)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dispute over the need for carpal tunnel release surgery. The applicant's physician recommended surgery, but the employer denied authorization and sought a Qualified Medical Examiner (QME) without initiating utilization review as required by Labor Code section 4610. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal, rescinded the order to take the case off calendar, and remanded it for an expedited hearing. The WCAB found the applicant was entitled to a hearing on whether a QME was permissible without prior utilization review and on the entitlement to the recommended surgery.

ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dispute over the need for carpal tunnel release surgery. The applicant's physician recommended surgery, but the employer denied authorization and sought a Qualified Medical Examiner (QME) without initiating utilization review as required by Labor Code section 4610. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal, rescinded the order to take the case off calendar, and remanded it for an expedited hearing. The WCAB found the applicant was entitled to a hearing on whether a QME was permissible without prior utilization review and on the entitlement to the recommended surgery.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured Case Analysis

ELIZABETH VENTOCILLA vs. KAISER PERMANENTE, Permissibly Self-Insured is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.