Home/Case Law/ELOY MORENO-HERNANDEZ vs. SYSCO FOODS/FRESH POINT, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

ELOY MORENO-HERNANDEZ vs. SYSCO FOODS/FRESH POINT, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: May 29, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ7987503; ADJ7516174

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal and rescinded the prior order compelling a second QME evaluation. The Board found that the Presiding Workers' Compensation Judge erred in deciding the QME issue at a Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC) without a clear agreement from both parties to submit the issue for decision. Additionally, there was no proper evidentiary record upon which the judge could base the decision. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including another MSC and potential trial, to properly address the QME selection dispute.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal and rescinded the prior order compelling a second QME evaluation. The Board found that the Presiding Workers' Compensation Judge erred in deciding the QME issue at a Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC) without a clear agreement from both parties to submit the issue for decision. Additionally, there was no proper evidentiary record upon which the judge could base the decision. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including another MSC and potential trial, to properly address the QME selection dispute.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.