CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding it an extraordinary remedy not warranted here. The defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm from denial, or that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Specifically, the applicant's primary treating physician was stipulated, and no evidence showed a subsequent establishment of care with a different physician. The defendant retains other available legal remedies.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding it an extraordinary remedy not warranted here. The defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm from denial, or that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. Specifically, the applicant's primary treating physician was stipulated, and no evidence showed a subsequent establishment of care with a different physician. The defendant retains other available legal remedies.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.