CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Elsa Umanzor's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), who found Umanzor's testimony lacked credibility and was not supported by medical evidence. Panel Qualified Medical Examiners determined Umanzor sustained no industrial injury in either of her claimed continuous trauma or specific injury cases. Consequently, all other issues became moot as injury was not established.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Elsa Umanzor's petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ), who found Umanzor's testimony lacked credibility and was not supported by medical evidence. Panel Qualified Medical Examiners determined Umanzor sustained no industrial injury in either of her claimed continuous trauma or specific injury cases. Consequently, all other issues became moot as injury was not established.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.