Home/Case Law/EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO, SARA ROMERO vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

EMILIO EDDIE ROMERO, SARA ROMERO vs. CLOROX PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Jul 20, 2016
Anaheim
ADJ4052884 (AHM 0136124), ADJ6520242, ADJ7028149

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant Clorox sought removal to the Appeals Board to review an order allowing a second deposition of the decedent's QME, arguing prejudice from delay. Defendant contended the applicant waived discovery rights and the issue should be the QME's report's evidentiary value. However, the QME's deposition subsequently occurred. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Removal as moot and ordered the matter returned to the trial calendar.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant Clorox sought removal to the Appeals Board to review an order allowing a second deposition of the decedent's QME, arguing prejudice from delay. Defendant contended the applicant waived discovery rights and the issue should be the QME's report's evidentiary value. However, the QME's deposition subsequently occurred. Therefore, the Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Removal as moot and ordered the matter returned to the trial calendar.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.