CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an appeal regarding a 100% permanent disability finding for Emilio Garza, who sustained injuries to multiple body parts. The defendant argued against the 100% rating, citing stipulated reports at 87% and a lack of vocational expert testimony. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding substantial evidence supported the WCJ's decision, particularly Dr. Ponton's neuropsychological opinion that the applicant could not compete in the open labor market due to cognitive, emotional, and physical limitations. The Board also found the defendant's contentions regarding apportionment and the RS Medical lien to be without merit.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an appeal regarding a 100% permanent disability finding for Emilio Garza, who sustained injuries to multiple body parts. The defendant argued against the 100% rating, citing stipulated reports at 87% and a lack of vocational expert testimony. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding substantial evidence supported the WCJ's decision, particularly Dr. Ponton's neuropsychological opinion that the applicant could not compete in the open labor market due to cognitive, emotional, and physical limitations. The Board also found the defendant's contentions regarding apportionment and the RS Medical lien to be without merit.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.