Home/Case Law/ERASMO PARTIDA vs. RAMGUARD INC.
Regular Decision

ERASMO PARTIDA vs. RAMGUARD INC.

Filed: Nov 18, 2015
Van Nuys
ADJ9074839

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant seeks reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release, arguing the $32,000 settlement for his May 15, 2013 industrial injury was inadequate because his treating physician's report was allegedly not considered. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition and the WCJ's report, which recommended dismissal or denial of the petition. The Board affirmed the original Order Approving Compromise and Release, adopting the WCJ's reasoning.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant seeks reconsideration of an approved Compromise and Release, arguing the $32,000 settlement for his May 15, 2013 industrial injury was inadequate because his treating physician's report was allegedly not considered. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition and the WCJ's report, which recommended dismissal or denial of the petition. The Board affirmed the original Order Approving Compromise and Release, adopting the WCJ's reasoning.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.