Home/Case Law/EVA STERBA vs. CARDIFF SOFWARE, INC., CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES
Regular DecisionDisqualification

EVA STERBA vs. CARDIFF SOFWARE, INC., CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES

Filed: Jul 23, 2007
San Francisco
SDO 341698

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a concise summary for a lawyer:

A petition to disqualify a Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) based on a past admitted bias against the applicant's law firm was denied. The Appeals Board found that the six-year-old declaration of bias had been sufficiently attenuated and lacked present evidence of actual or apparent bias. Future disqualification would require specific evidence demonstrating bias.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a concise summary for a lawyer:

A petition to disqualify a Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) based on a past admitted bias against the applicant's law firm was denied. The Appeals Board found that the six-year-old declaration of bias had been sufficiently attenuated and lacked present evidence of actual or apparent bias. Future disqualification would require specific evidence demonstrating bias.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

EVA STERBA vs. CARDIFF SOFWARE, INC., CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox