CompFox AI Summary
George Rice Farish appealed an order denying his motion to modify child support, arguing a material and substantial change in circumstances following his 1987 divorce from Dorothy Farish. He cited a decline in his net resources, remarriage, the birth of another child, and increased private school tuition for the three children from his first marriage. The trial court denied the motion, finding no material and substantial change and affirming the original $4,500 monthly child support, along with awarding attorney's fees to Dorothy Farish. The appellate court upheld this decision, concluding that Farish's income had increased, his debt load had substantially decreased, and the other factors did not warrant a modification of the child support order.
Farish v. Farish is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
George Rice Farish appealed an order denying his motion to modify child support, arguing a material and substantial change in circumstances following his 1987 divorce from Dorothy Farish. He cited a decline in his net resources, remarriage, the birth of another child, and increased private school tuition for the three children from his first marriage. The trial court denied the motion, finding no material and substantial change and affirming the original $4,500 monthly child support, along with awarding attorney's fees to Dorothy Farish. The appellate court upheld this decision, concluding that Farish's income had increased, his debt load had substantially decreased, and the other factors did not warrant a modification of the child support order.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.