Home/Case Law/Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company
Regular Panel Decision DecisionOpinion

Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant contractor, Martin Winters of Winters Roofing Company, entered an agreement to replace a roof for homeowners Robert and Joanie Emerson. After the newly installed roof developed leaks, a subcontractor hired by Winters to make repairs caused a fire, resulting in over $871,069 in damages. Federal Insurance Company, as subrogor to the Emersons' rights, sued Winters for negligence and breach of contract. The trial court initially granted summary judgment for the defendant, but the Court of Appeals reversed this decision. This Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' ruling, holding that the defendant had an implied non-delegable contractual duty to perform the roofing services in a careful, skillful, diligent, and workmanlike manner, a duty which was not discharged by delegating the work to a subcontractor. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant contractor, Martin Winters of Winters Roofing Company, entered an agreement to replace a roof for homeowners Robert and Joanie Emerson. After the newly installed roof developed leaks, a subcontractor hired by Winters to make repairs caused a fire, resulting in over $871,069 in damages. Federal Insurance Company, as subrogor to the Emersons' rights, sued Winters for negligence and breach of contract. The trial court initially granted summary judgment for the defendant, but the Court of Appeals reversed this decision. This Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' ruling, holding that the defendant had an implied non-delegable contractual duty to perform the roofing services in a careful, skillful, diligent, and workmanlike manner, a duty which was not discharged by delegating the work to a subcontractor. The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company Case Analysis

Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing Company is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.