Home/Case Law/FRANCISCO MARTINEZ vs. BORDIER'S NURSERY, INC., AARLA/CLARENDON/ENSTAR SEABRIGHT; CYPRESS INSURANCE administered by BHHS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

FRANCISCO MARTINEZ vs. BORDIER'S NURSERY, INC., AARLA/CLARENDON/ENSTAR SEABRIGHT; CYPRESS INSURANCE administered by BHHS

Filed: Jun 06, 2014
Anaheim
ADJ7047287, ADJ7047274

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board denied the defendant insurer's petition for reconsideration. The insurer sought to overturn a prior award finding the applicant sustained cumulative spinal and extremity injuries. The Board found the applicant's date of injury, for statute of limitations purposes, was October 9, 2009, which was subsequent to his layoff. This date also satisfied the condition for post-termination claims under Labor Code section 3600(a)(10). Finally, the Board affirmed that the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinions constituted substantial evidence supporting the original award.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board denied the defendant insurer's petition for reconsideration. The insurer sought to overturn a prior award finding the applicant sustained cumulative spinal and extremity injuries. The Board found the applicant's date of injury, for statute of limitations purposes, was October 9, 2009, which was subsequent to his layoff. This date also satisfied the condition for post-termination claims under Labor Code section 3600(a)(10). Finally, the Board affirmed that the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinions constituted substantial evidence supporting the original award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.