CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's award due to questions regarding the substantiality of the Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) opinion. The Board found the QME's report and deposition testimony unreliable due to an incorrect work history, inadequate examination, and potentially flawed application of disability rating guidelines. Consequently, the Board affirmed the original award but deferred issues of permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees, returning the case to the WCJ for further proceedings and potentially a new medical evaluation.
FRANCISCO PEREZ vs. MASSIVE PRINTS, HARTFORD/ SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's award due to questions regarding the substantiality of the Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) opinion. The Board found the QME's report and deposition testimony unreliable due to an incorrect work history, inadequate examination, and potentially flawed application of disability rating guidelines. Consequently, the Board affirmed the original award but deferred issues of permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney fees, returning the case to the WCJ for further proceedings and potentially a new medical evaluation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.