Home/Case Law/Frogge v. Davenport
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Frogge v. Davenport

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Mr. William Frogge resigned from the Memphis Housing Authority (MHA) due to unconfirmed rumors of impending termination and a belief he would lose accumulated benefits. The Tennessee Department of Employment Security (TDES) initially denied his unemployment benefits, a decision upheld by the Appeals Tribunal and Board of Review. The Shelby County Chancery Court reversed this, finding Frogge had good cause. MHA and TDES appealed. The Tennessee Court of Appeals, however, determined that Frogge's decision to quit was based purely on speculation, not substantial evidence, and thus he lacked good cause connected to his work under T.C.A § 50-7-303(a)(l). Consequently, the Court of Appeals reversed the chancellor's decision and affirmed the TDES's original denial of benefits.

Frogge v. Davenport is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Mr. William Frogge resigned from the Memphis Housing Authority (MHA) due to unconfirmed rumors of impending termination and a belief he would lose accumulated benefits. The Tennessee Department of Employment Security (TDES) initially denied his unemployment benefits, a decision upheld by the Appeals Tribunal and Board of Review. The Shelby County Chancery Court reversed this, finding Frogge had good cause. MHA and TDES appealed. The Tennessee Court of Appeals, however, determined that Frogge's decision to quit was based purely on speculation, not substantial evidence, and thus he lacked good cause connected to his work under T.C.A § 50-7-303(a)(l). Consequently, the Court of Appeals reversed the chancellor's decision and affirmed the TDES's original denial of benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Frogge v. Davenport workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Frogge v. Davenport case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Frogge v. Davenport Case Analysis

Frogge v. Davenport is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.