Home/Case Law/GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Aug 03, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ4283233

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Gary Johnston's claim for workers' compensation benefits for a cumulative injury to his cervical spine. Initially, the workers' compensation judge denied the claim, finding no industrial injury and citing the statute of limitations. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversed the initial decision, and found that Johnston sustained a cumulative injury that was not time-barred. The Board has now denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, affirming its prior decision that the applicant's cervical spine injury is compensable.

GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Gary Johnston's claim for workers' compensation benefits for a cumulative injury to his cervical spine. Initially, the workers' compensation judge denied the claim, finding no industrial injury and citing the statute of limitations. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversed the initial decision, and found that Johnston sustained a cumulative injury that was not time-barred. The Board has now denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, affirming its prior decision that the applicant's cervical spine injury is compensable.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

GARY JOHNSTON vs. BAY PACIFIC PIPELINES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.