CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Gladys Meza's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order, but rather an interlocutory procedural/evidentiary decision. The Board also denied her Petition for Removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision ultimately issues. These decisions were based on the reasoning provided in the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Gladys Meza's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order, but rather an interlocutory procedural/evidentiary decision. The Board also denied her Petition for Removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision ultimately issues. These decisions were based on the reasoning provided in the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.