CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant's petition for reconsideration which the Board dismissed as improperly filed, as it was not from a "final" order determining substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The underlying issue concerns whether the applicant's alleged head injury from a paintball incident caused a subsequent aneurysm. The judge recommended further discovery by an appropriate medical specialist to determine causation, as the existing QME's report was deemed insufficient on this complex medical issue.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant's petition for reconsideration which the Board dismissed as improperly filed, as it was not from a "final" order determining substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The underlying issue concerns whether the applicant's alleged head injury from a paintball incident caused a subsequent aneurysm. The judge recommended further discovery by an appropriate medical specialist to determine causation, as the existing QME's report was deemed insufficient on this complex medical issue.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.