Home/Case Law/Gonzalo Rodriguez vs. Potential Industries, Chartis Costa Mesa, Applied Risk Omaha
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

Gonzalo Rodriguez vs. Potential Industries, Chartis Costa Mesa, Applied Risk Omaha

Filed: May 29, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ1383173, ADJ1689839

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a finding that Gonzalo Rodriguez did not sustain industrial cumulative injuries. The applicant's testimony was deemed not credible due to inconsistencies and his admission of Alzheimer's disease. Furthermore, the medical report was found to lack substantial evidence, as it did not adequately address pre-existing conditions or definitively link the applicant's complaints to his employment. Finally, the Board found no basis to presume compensability due to late denials.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a finding that Gonzalo Rodriguez did not sustain industrial cumulative injuries. The applicant's testimony was deemed not credible due to inconsistencies and his admission of Alzheimer's disease. Furthermore, the medical report was found to lack substantial evidence, as it did not adequately address pre-existing conditions or definitively link the applicant's complaints to his employment. Finally, the Board found no basis to presume compensability due to late denials.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.