CompFox AI Summary
Applicant sought removal from an order continuing his workers' compensation case to trial, arguing his condition was not permanent and stationary and required further medical development on urological, sexual, and sleep issues. The Appeals Board denied the petition for removal. They adopted the WCJ's reasoning but noted discrepancies regarding applicant's ongoing treatment. Therefore, the applicant's request to rescind the order and continue the case was denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant sought removal from an order continuing his workers' compensation case to trial, arguing his condition was not permanent and stationary and required further medical development on urological, sexual, and sleep issues. The Appeals Board denied the petition for removal. They adopted the WCJ's reasoning but noted discrepancies regarding applicant's ongoing treatment. Therefore, the applicant's request to rescind the order and continue the case was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.