Home/Case Law/HAI GRIFFIN vs. CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY EAST, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES EXNARD (Adjusting Agency)
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HAI GRIFFIN vs. CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY EAST, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES EXNARD (Adjusting Agency)

Filed: Mar 24, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1503980 (GRO 0034241)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration, finding their prior order was not a final decision and thus not subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for removal, upholding their authority to develop the record further. This was based on inconsistencies and lack of explanation in the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) reports regarding the applicant's impairment. The AME will be provided with the complete formal DEU rating and a discussion of substantial medical evidence principles to issue a supplemental report.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's petition for reconsideration, finding their prior order was not a final decision and thus not subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the defendant's petition for removal, upholding their authority to develop the record further. This was based on inconsistencies and lack of explanation in the Agreed Medical Evaluator's (AME) reports regarding the applicant's impairment. The AME will be provided with the complete formal DEU rating and a discussion of substantial medical evidence principles to issue a supplemental report.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.