CompFox AI Summary
Usha Haley, an Associate Professor at the University of Tennessee, was denied tenure and subsequently filed several lawsuits, including a breach of contract claim with the Tennessee Claims Commission, which she later withdrew. The University argued that filing with the Claims Commission activated a waiver provision, barring her other related federal and state causes of action. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee certified a question to the Tennessee Supreme Court regarding this waiver. The Tennessee Supreme Court held that a voluntary non-suit of a claim filed with the Claims Commission still activates the waiver provision of Tennessee Code Annotated section 9-8-307(b). The Court also affirmed that Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, which authorizes the certified question procedure, is a constitutional exercise of its inherent power.
Haley v. University of Tennessee-Knoxville is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Usha Haley, an Associate Professor at the University of Tennessee, was denied tenure and subsequently filed several lawsuits, including a breach of contract claim with the Tennessee Claims Commission, which she later withdrew. The University argued that filing with the Claims Commission activated a waiver provision, barring her other related federal and state causes of action. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee certified a question to the Tennessee Supreme Court regarding this waiver. The Tennessee Supreme Court held that a voluntary non-suit of a claim filed with the Claims Commission still activates the waiver provision of Tennessee Code Annotated section 9-8-307(b). The Court also affirmed that Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, which authorizes the certified question procedure, is a constitutional exercise of its inherent power.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.