CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed petitions for reconsideration because they were filed from non-final interlocutory orders that did not determine substantive rights. The Board also denied a petition for removal, incorporating the WCJ's reasoning, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCAB found that the orders at issue related to procedural matters like evidence and discovery, not substantive liability. Therefore, the petitions were dismissed and denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed petitions for reconsideration because they were filed from non-final interlocutory orders that did not determine substantive rights. The Board also denied a petition for removal, incorporating the WCJ's reasoning, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCAB found that the orders at issue related to procedural matters like evidence and discovery, not substantive liability. Therefore, the petitions were dismissed and denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.