Home/Case Law/HELEN DEMBY vs. MAXIM HEALTHCARE, INC., INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, administered by BROADSPIRE
Regular Decision

HELEN DEMBY vs. MAXIM HEALTHCARE, INC., INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, administered by BROADSPIRE

Filed: Mar 28, 2008
San Francisco
LAO 0874404

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Helen Demby's petition for reconsideration in this case against Maxim Healthcare, Inc. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, finding that even if fraud was present regarding prior back treatment, it does not automatically negate a finding of industrial injury. Benefits may be barred only if directly connected to the fraudulent misrepresentation, as determined on a case-by-case basis.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Helen Demby's petition for reconsideration in this case against Maxim Healthcare, Inc. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, finding that even if fraud was present regarding prior back treatment, it does not automatically negate a finding of industrial injury. Benefits may be barred only if directly connected to the fraudulent misrepresentation, as determined on a case-by-case basis.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.