Home/Case Law/Herbert Miller vs. O'Reilly Auto Parts, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY, CORVEL
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Herbert Miller vs. O'Reilly Auto Parts, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY, CORVEL

Filed: Jul 10, 2017
Redding
ADJ 10470293

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the finding of industrial injury for an applicant who was injured in a car accident while commuting home after picking up a company part. This trip was deemed a "special mission" for the employer, thus overcoming the going-and-coming rule defense. However, the issue of reimbursement for family-provided home health care was deferred for further development of the record, as the applicant did not initially meet the prescription requirements.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the finding of industrial injury for an applicant who was injured in a car accident while commuting home after picking up a company part. This trip was deemed a "special mission" for the employer, thus overcoming the going-and-coming rule defense. However, the issue of reimbursement for family-provided home health care was deferred for further development of the record, as the applicant did not initially meet the prescription requirements.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.