CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reconsidered a decision awarding 74% permanent disability. The defendant argued the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME), Dr. Deshmukh, improperly used the hernia chapter of the AMA Guides for impairment rating, violating Almaraz-Guzman principles. The WCAB agreed that Dr. Deshmukh's rating lacked sufficient explanation for deviating from standard orthopedic evaluations. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the permanent disability and attorney's fees findings, returning the case for further proceedings, potentially including a supplemental report or deposition from Dr. Deshmukh, to properly address impairment rating.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reconsidered a decision awarding 74% permanent disability. The defendant argued the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME), Dr. Deshmukh, improperly used the hernia chapter of the AMA Guides for impairment rating, violating Almaraz-Guzman principles. The WCAB agreed that Dr. Deshmukh's rating lacked sufficient explanation for deviating from standard orthopedic evaluations. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the permanent disability and attorney's fees findings, returning the case for further proceedings, potentially including a supplemental report or deposition from Dr. Deshmukh, to properly address impairment rating.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.