Home/Case Law/HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionReconsideration

HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: May 02, 2013
Fresno
ADJ3908100 (FRE 0232929) ADJ716050 (FRE 0232930)

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary for a lawyer: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration regarding a disallowed lien claim by Schroeder Chiropractic North (SCN). The original decision disallowed SCN's lien, in part due to a statute of limitations issue on one injury, and because SCN failed to prove it was the authorized primary treating physician. The Board found the WCJ's reasoning unclear regarding SCN's status as an authorized physician and the applicant's treatment choices under Labor Code sections 4600 and 4601, especially concerning Medical Provider Networks. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level for redetermination with a clearer explanation of the facts and law.

HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in Fresno. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Fresno.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary for a lawyer:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration regarding a disallowed lien claim by Schroeder Chiropractic North (SCN). The original decision disallowed SCN's lien, in part due to a statute of limitations issue on one injury, and because SCN failed to prove it was the authorized primary treating physician. The Board found the WCJ's reasoning unclear regarding SCN's status as an authorized physician and the applicant's treatment choices under Labor Code sections 4600 and 4601, especially concerning Medical Provider Networks. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level for redetermination with a clearer explanation of the facts and law.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured workers compensation case in Fresno. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured case law summary from Fresno. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured Case Analysis

HORTENCIA MATA-KLINE vs. SAVEMART SUPERMARKETS, Permissibly Self-Insured is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Fresno. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.