Home/Case Law/Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com
Regular Panel Decision DecisionExpedited Hearing Order

Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com

Filed: Apr 02, 2018
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
2017-05-0892

CompFox AI Summary

Michelle Hunt, an employee of Amazon.com, sustained injuries including her right ankle, wrist, and low back after a slip and fall incident in 2015. Amazon provided a panel of physicians, and Ms. Hunt chose Dr. Jeffrey Hazlewood. Despite conservative treatment, Ms. Hunt's low back pain persisted and worsened, showing a diffuse disc bulge and mild central disc extrusion at L5-S1 on an MRI. Dr. Hazlewood concluded the back pain did not warrant a specialist referral. Ms. Hunt sought an expedited hearing to request a panel of orthopedists for her low back complaints, arguing Dr. Hazlewood's care failed to improve her symptoms. The Court, however, denied her request, finding her testimony alone insufficient to overcome the presumption of medical necessity accorded to Dr. Hazlewood's opinion.

Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Michelle Hunt, an employee of Amazon.com, sustained injuries including her right ankle, wrist, and low back after a slip and fall incident in 2015. Amazon provided a panel of physicians, and Ms. Hunt chose Dr. Jeffrey Hazlewood. Despite conservative treatment, Ms. Hunt's low back pain persisted and worsened, showing a diffuse disc bulge and mild central disc extrusion at L5-S1 on an MRI. Dr. Hazlewood concluded the back pain did not warrant a specialist referral. Ms. Hunt sought an expedited hearing to request a panel of orthopedists for her low back complaints, arguing Dr. Hazlewood's care failed to improve her symptoms. The Court, however, denied her request, finding her testimony alone insufficient to overcome the presumption of medical necessity accorded to Dr. Hazlewood's opinion.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com workers compensation case in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com case law summary from Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com Case Analysis

Hunt, Michele v. Amazon.com is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.