Home/Case Law/In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority
Regular Panel Decision DecisionArbitration Motion

In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

The petitioners sought to vacate an arbitration award issued by Theodore Kheel, the impartial chairman of the transit industry. Their grievance concerned work pick rules which they claimed violated their seniority status and previous agreements between the Authority and its employees' unions. The arbitrator had denied their grievance, leading the petitioners to allege partiality and misbehavior on his part for consulting the Transport Workers Union. The court, however, found no basis for these charges, noting the informal nature of the arbitration and the arbitrator's prerogative to seek the union's opinion given the potential impact on other employees. Ultimately, the court concluded there was no impartiality or misbehavior and dismissed the petition to vacate the award.

In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority is a workers' compensation case decided in New York Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in New York Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The petitioners sought to vacate an arbitration award issued by Theodore Kheel, the impartial chairman of the transit industry. Their grievance concerned work pick rules which they claimed violated their seniority status and previous agreements between the Authority and its employees' unions. The arbitrator had denied their grievance, leading the petitioners to allege partiality and misbehavior on his part for consulting the Transport Workers Union. The court, however, found no basis for these charges, noting the informal nature of the arbitration and the arbitrator's prerogative to seek the union's opinion given the potential impact on other employees. Ultimately, the court concluded there was no impartiality or misbehavior and dismissed the petition to vacate the award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority workers compensation case in New York Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority case law summary from New York Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority Case Analysis

In re the Arbitration between Herman & New York City Transit Authority is a legal case related to workers' compensation in New York Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.