Home/Case Law/In re the Estate of Wilson
Regular Panel Decision DecisionPetition for Discovery

In re the Estate of Wilson

New York Surrogate's Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Dorothy S. Wilson, as executrix of the estate of Leonard R. Wilson, filed a petition for discovery against Lee Ford concerning the proceeds of Leonard R. Wilson's retirement plan, which named Ford as the beneficiary. Mr. Wilson died in 1985, having a vested benefit in the Corporate Profit Sharing Plan and Trust Agreement for Cobblestone Enterprises, Inc. The court considered the 1984 amendments to ERISA requiring a qualified preretirement survivor annuity (QPSA) for surviving spouses. Despite the plan's amendment occurring after Mr. Wilson's death, a transition rule mandated the QPSA amendments be treated as in effect at the time of death. The court, citing no New York authority, concluded that given the Cobblestone plan was a 'defined benefit plan' and under the ERISA transition rule, Dorothy S. Wilson, as the surviving spouse, was entitled to the entire $8,643.38 proceeds of the retirement plan.

In re the Estate of Wilson is a workers' compensation case decided in New York Surrogate's Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in New York Surrogate's Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Dorothy S. Wilson, as executrix of the estate of Leonard R. Wilson, filed a petition for discovery against Lee Ford concerning the proceeds of Leonard R. Wilson's retirement plan, which named Ford as the beneficiary. Mr. Wilson died in 1985, having a vested benefit in the Corporate Profit Sharing Plan and Trust Agreement for Cobblestone Enterprises, Inc. The court considered the 1984 amendments to ERISA requiring a qualified preretirement survivor annuity (QPSA) for surviving spouses. Despite the plan's amendment occurring after Mr. Wilson's death, a transition rule mandated the QPSA amendments be treated as in effect at the time of death. The court, citing no New York authority, concluded that given the Cobblestone plan was a 'defined benefit plan' and under the ERISA transition rule, Dorothy S. Wilson, as the surviving spouse, was entitled to the entire $8,643.38 proceeds of the retirement plan.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

In re the Estate of Wilson workers compensation case in New York Surrogate's Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

In re the Estate of Wilson case law summary from New York Surrogate's Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

In re the Estate of Wilson Case Analysis

In re the Estate of Wilson is a legal case related to workers' compensation in New York Surrogate's Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

In re the Estate of Wilson – New York Surrogate's Court | CompFox | CompFox