Home/Case Law/IRIS CARDONA vs. ADECCO, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

IRIS CARDONA vs. ADECCO, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Oct 12, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ6905244

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration in the case of Iris Cardona v. Adecco; BroadsPIRE. The applicant alleged an injury from pulling a food cart, but the Board adopted the WCJ's report finding her not credible. Key factors included inconsistencies in her testimony and the failure to produce corroborating witnesses. The Board also noted that alleged violations of LC §3550 and §3551 were raised for the first time on appeal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration in the case of Iris Cardona v. Adecco; BroadsPIRE. The applicant alleged an injury from pulling a food cart, but the Board adopted the WCJ's report finding her not credible. Key factors included inconsistencies in her testimony and the failure to produce corroborating witnesses. The Board also noted that alleged violations of LC §3550 and §3551 were raised for the first time on appeal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.